Or Don't Say Anything At All?

I've had plans to do some book reviewing on here... or perhaps I should say that I've had the best of intentions... lately. In fact, I have a stack of about fifteen books I'm trying to get through at the moment. I've read three in the last three days. And each time I put one down (if I don't throw it across the room), I sit down at my computer to write a blog review.

But I just can't.

Why, you ask? Because I don't have anything good to say about them. I eventually head over to Goodreads and post a short review (where I try to say the nicest things I can possibly say) about them. And I might link it to this blog, but probably not.

I don't want to badmouth books. I know there are a lot of review sites out there who post negative reviews, and I've admitted on here that I like to read them. Some of them are absolutely hilarious. And two of them (remember Pregnesia and Mr. Interstellar Fellar?... yeah...) actually made me want to buy the book, even though they were scathing--and I mean scathing--reviews.

Mostly, though, it's that once I'm finished with a book I don't like, I just don't want to think about it anymore. I'm lucky if I can sit down at my computer and remember the name of the book I just read and hated. I don't really want to talk about it, let alone blog about it. Generally, even a few sentences for Goodreads puts me off my moment, and I need to go pick up Rules of the Wild and get the taste of that other book (whatever it's called) out of my memory.

What about you? Do you find that you'd like to review books one way or the other? Do you like reading reviews where the reviewer ultimately doesn't recommend the book to anyone? What's the last book you read that you really liked? If you follow a book reviewer, would you rather know what they think of a particular book, regardless of whether they liked it or not? Which do you tend to remember more: the books you've loved, or the books you've hated?

Well, I'm off to post a short review on Goodreads, and then back to reading. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, dear reader, on the above questions. It will be good food-for-thought for me, and I always love hearing comments from you!

posted under , |

2 comments:

Linda Rader said...

I like to read an honest reviewer. I don't want to hear the best thing about a bad book because it would mislead me into buying it. However, I understand the resistence to panning a book of a colleague. I have the same problem now because I am reading a book of someone in my critique group and I don't care for it. Because they are so close to me I think I will opt out of saying anything about that book at all online. But if you don't have a stake in the relationship with a writer I, as a reader, would rather hear an honest, if critical review. Just me. Tact, but honesty is the best policy.

Daniel Dragomirescu said...

Nice blog. Congratulations!
Daniel D. PEACEMAN, editor of Contemporary Horizon Magazine
E-mail: drgdaniel@yahoo.com

Newer Post Older Post Home

Gotta Read This Book

Kieran Kramer The Earl Is Mine Contest

NKotWB Twitter Feed

About

We blog together so we can write alone.

In Association w/Amazon

There was an error in this gadget

Follow Us on Facebook

About NKotWB

New Kids on the Writer's Block is a group blog. We are ten writers who banded together to go through the process of publication as a community. We're pre-published (for the time being), and are open with our process. Please feel free to ask questions. Thanks for stopping by, and welcome!

Followers


Recent Comments